Home → Suburbs → Compare
Gymea vs Faulconbridge
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
8,219 #855
👥 Population
4,156 #1,852
$1,020/wk #1,100
💰 Median Weekly Income
$933/wk #1,777
$500/wk #576
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$420/wk #1,513
39 years
🎂 Median Age
40 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,077/mo
$2,049/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,152/wk
$2,514/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,391/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Faulconbridge
19.5%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Gymea
♂ 48.4% ♀ 51.6%
Density: 3725 people/km²
Faulconbridge
♂ 49.2% ♀ 50.8%
Density: 278 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Gymea
Lower Rent Faulconbridge
Larger Population Gymea
More Affordable Faulconbridge