Home → Suburbs → Compare
Hocking vs Geographe
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
6,987 #1,060
👥 Population
3,622 #2,085
$956/wk #1,554
💰 Median Weekly Income
$677/wk #5,881
$400/wk #1,854
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$360/wk #2,908
34 years
🎂 Median Age
50 years
$1,965/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$2,234/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,333/wk
$2,434/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,648/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.3 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Geographe
27.0%
Moderate Stress
👥 Demographics
Hocking
♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 2879 people/km²
Geographe
♂ 48.8% ♀ 51.2%
Density: 634 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Hocking
Lower Rent Geographe
Larger Population Hocking
More Affordable Geographe