Home → Suburbs → Compare
Horseshoe Lagoon vs Coverty
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
213 #6,791
👥 Population
107 #8,750
$657/wk #6,209
💰 Median Weekly Income
$365/wk #8,802
$256/wk #6,032
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$230/wk #6,811
38 years
🎂 Median Age
54 years
$1,300/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$758/mo
$1,339/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$703/wk
$1,666/wk
👪 Family Income
$778/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Horseshoe Lagoon
19.1%
Affordable
Coverty
32.7%
Moderate Stress
👥 Demographics
Horseshoe Lagoon
♂ 54.4% ♀ 45.6%
Density: 3 people/km²
Coverty
♂ 49.5% ♀ 50.5%
Density: 1 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Horseshoe Lagoon
Lower Rent Coverty
Larger Population Horseshoe Lagoon
More Affordable Horseshoe Lagoon