Home → Suburbs → Compare
Hurlstone Park vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
5,001 #1,565
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$968/wk #1,455
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$460/wk #939
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
42 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,121/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,573/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Hurlstone Park
21.7%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Hurlstone Park
♂ 48.4% ♀ 51.6%
Density: 4163 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Hurlstone Park
Larger Population Hurlstone Park
More Affordable Hurlstone Park