Home → Suburbs → Compare
Kangaroo Ground vs Cottles Bridge
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,208 #3,690
👥 Population
609 #4,716
$887/wk #2,283
💰 Median Weekly Income
$835/wk #3,034
$383/wk #2,419
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$260/wk #5,884
44 years
🎂 Median Age
52 years
$3,337/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,524/mo
$2,909/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,170/wk
$3,036/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,445/wk
3.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Kangaroo Ground
13.2%
Affordable
Cottles Bridge
12.0%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Kangaroo Ground
♂ 49.5% ♀ 50.5%
Density: 38 people/km²
Cottles Bridge
♂ 49.9% ♀ 50.1%
Density: 33 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Kangaroo Ground
Lower Rent Cottles Bridge
Larger Population Kangaroo Ground
More Affordable Cottles Bridge