Home → Suburbs → Compare
Kearsley vs Whittingham
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
838 #4,230
👥 Population
421 #5,325
$668/wk #6,027
💰 Median Weekly Income
$760/wk #4,318
$315/wk #4,253
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$320/wk #4,051
38 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$1,614/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$1,467/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,958/wk
$1,816/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,125/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Kearsley
21.5%
Affordable
Whittingham
16.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Kearsley
♂ 54.0% ♀ 46.0%
Density: 99 people/km²
Whittingham
♂ 53.9% ♀ 46.1%
Density: 10 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Whittingham
Lower Rent Kearsley
Larger Population Kearsley
More Affordable Kearsley