Kempton vs Tunnack

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
420 #5,331
👥 Population
212 #6,808
$695/wk #5,585
💰 Median Weekly Income
$540/wk #7,837
$250/wk #6,115
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$200/wk #7,374
43 years
🎂 Median Age
46 years
$1,300/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,018/mo
$1,241/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,083/wk
$1,555/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,212/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
2.3 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Kempton

20.1%
Affordable

Tunnack

18.5%
Affordable

Kempton

♂ 52.5% ♀ 47.5%
Density: 5 people/km²

Tunnack

♂ 51.5% ♀ 48.5%
Density: 3 people/km²
Higher Income Kempton
Lower Rent Tunnack
Larger Population Kempton
More Affordable Tunnack

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level