Home → Suburbs → Compare
Kidman Park vs Osborne
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,874 #1,968
👥 Population
1,951 #3,067
$798/wk #3,630
💰 Median Weekly Income
$647/wk #6,337
$358/wk #3,047
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$300/wk #4,529
44 years
🎂 Median Age
41 years
$1,869/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,468/mo
$1,637/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,336/wk
$2,084/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,676/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.3 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Kidman Park
21.9%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Kidman Park
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 2169 people/km²
Osborne
♂ 47.4% ♀ 52.6%
Density: 1372 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Kidman Park
Lower Rent Osborne
Larger Population Kidman Park
More Affordable Osborne