Home → Suburbs → Compare
Killarney Heights vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,502 #1,724
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$1,063/wk #859
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$923/wk #30
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
43 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$3,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$3,426/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$3,809/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Killarney Heights
26.9%
Moderate Stress
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Killarney Heights
♂ 49.2% ♀ 50.8%
Density: 1061 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Killarney Heights
Lower Rent Acacia Gardens
Larger Population Killarney Heights
More Affordable Acacia Gardens