Home → Suburbs → Compare
Kirkconnell vs Burnt Bridge
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
219 #6,722
👥 Population
110 #8,678
$637/wk #6,493
💰 Median Weekly Income
$437/wk #8,694
$0/wk #8,863
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$178/wk #7,951
43 years
🎂 Median Age
30 years
$1,950/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,300/mo
$2,583/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,218/wk
$2,125/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,100/wk
3.3 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Burnt Bridge
14.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Kirkconnell
♂ 93.7% ♀ 6.3%
Density: 16 people/km²
Burnt Bridge
♂ 49.1% ♀ 50.9%
Density: 28 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Kirkconnell
Lower Rent Burnt Bridge
Larger Population Kirkconnell
More Affordable Burnt Bridge