Home → Suburbs → Compare
Lansdowne vs Tumbling Waters
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
499 #5,033
👥 Population
254 #6,383
$1,135/wk #592
💰 Median Weekly Income
$858/wk #2,652
$250/wk #6,115
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk #3,104
39 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,000/mo
$2,675/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,800/wk
$2,924/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,023/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Lansdowne
9.3%
Affordable
Tumbling Waters
19.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Lansdowne
♂ 52.3% ♀ 47.7%
Density: 2 people/km²
Tumbling Waters
♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 4 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Lansdowne
Lower Rent Lansdowne
Larger Population Lansdowne
More Affordable Lansdowne