Home → Suburbs → Compare
Lower King vs Roebourne
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,890 #3,111
👥 Population
975 #4,016
$727/wk #4,972
💰 Median Weekly Income
$366/wk #8,801
$320/wk #4,051
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$150/wk #8,205
48 years
🎂 Median Age
34 years
$1,619/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,500/mo
$1,448/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,062/wk
$1,904/wk
👪 Family Income
$990/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Lower King
22.1%
Affordable
Roebourne
14.1%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Lower King
♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 208 people/km²
Roebourne
♂ 59.4% ♀ 40.6%
Density: 6 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Lower King
Lower Rent Roebourne
Larger Population Lower King
More Affordable Roebourne