Macleod vs Tatura

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
9,892 #657
👥 Population
4,955 #1,582
$908/wk #2,036
💰 Median Weekly Income
$715/wk #5,198
$396/wk #2,191
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$245/wk #6,551
41 years
🎂 Median Age
44 years
$2,296/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,300/mo
$1,966/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,357/wk
$2,648/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,801/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Macleod

20.1%
Affordable

Tatura

18.1%
Affordable

Macleod

♂ 47.7% ♀ 52.3%
Density: 2164 people/km²

Tatura

♂ 49.6% ♀ 50.4%
Density: 40 people/km²
Higher Income Macleod
Lower Rent Tatura
Larger Population Macleod
More Affordable Tatura

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level