Marcoola vs Pine Mountain

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
3,355 #2,198
👥 Population
1,695 #3,243
$768/wk #4,169
💰 Median Weekly Income
$985/wk #1,309
$406/wk #1,812
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$400/wk #1,854
45 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,100/mo
$1,401/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,604/wk
$1,764/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,706/wk
2.2 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Marcoola

29.0%
Moderate Stress

Pine Mountain

15.4%
Affordable

Marcoola

♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 230 people/km²

Pine Mountain

♂ 51.6% ♀ 48.4%
Density: 44 people/km²
Higher Income Pine Mountain
Lower Rent Pine Mountain
Larger Population Marcoola
More Affordable Pine Mountain

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level