McCullys Gap vs Adaminaby

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
262 #6,314
👥 Population
339 #5,760
$840/wk #2,948
💰 Median Weekly Income
$588/wk #7,257
$300/wk #4,529
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$300/wk #4,529
41 years
🎂 Median Age
52 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,083/mo
$2,299/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$954/wk
$2,471/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,350/wk
2.8 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

McCullys Gap

13.0%
Affordable

Adaminaby

31.4%
Moderate Stress

McCullys Gap

♂ 50.0% ♀ 50.0%
Density: 3 people/km²

Adaminaby

♂ 54.5% ♀ 45.5%
Density: 1 people/km²
Higher Income McCullys Gap
Lower Rent McCullys Gap
Larger Population Adaminaby
More Affordable McCullys Gap

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level