Home → Suburbs → Compare
Mount Sheridan vs Fig Tree Pocket
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
8,678 #806
👥 Population
4,345 #1,781
$857/wk #2,666
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,205/wk #410
$390/wk #2,258
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$590/wk #259
37 years
🎂 Median Age
40 years
$1,542/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$3,033/mo
$1,826/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$3,791/wk
$2,018/wk
👪 Family Income
$4,226/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Mount Sheridan
21.4%
Affordable
Fig Tree Pocket
15.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Mount Sheridan
♂ 47.9% ♀ 52.1%
Density: 1288 people/km²
Fig Tree Pocket
♂ 50.2% ♀ 49.8%
Density: 1015 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Fig Tree Pocket
Lower Rent Mount Sheridan
Larger Population Mount Sheridan
More Affordable Mount Sheridan