Home → Suburbs → Compare
Murrumbateman vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,607 #2,094
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$1,389/wk #184
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$528/wk #490
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
40 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$3,348/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$3,453/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
3.1 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Murrumbateman
15.8%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Murrumbateman
♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 26 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Murrumbateman
Lower Rent Murrumbateman
Larger Population Acacia Gardens
More Affordable Murrumbateman