Nabageena vs Stonehenge

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
34
👥 Population
17
$437/wk
💰 Median Weekly Income
$900/wk
$225/wk
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$188/wk
53 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$433/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$1,124/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,750/wk
$1,625/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,750/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
3.0 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Nabageena

20.0%
Affordable

Stonehenge

6.8%
Affordable

Nabageena

♂ 60.6% ♀ 39.4%
Density: 1 people/km²

Stonehenge

♂ 63.6% ♀ 36.4%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income Stonehenge
Lower Rent Stonehenge
Larger Population Nabageena
More Affordable Stonehenge

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level