Home → Suburbs → Compare
Nanango vs Churchill
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,679 #2,056
👥 Population
1,842 #3,145
$472/wk #8,496
💰 Median Weekly Income
$615/wk #6,854
$220/wk #7,029
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$300/wk #4,529
53 years
🎂 Median Age
34 years
$1,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,213/mo
$865/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,174/wk
$1,143/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,385/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Nanango
25.4%
Moderate Stress
Churchill
25.6%
Moderate Stress
👥 Demographics
Nanango
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 118 people/km²
Churchill
♂ 47.0% ♀ 53.0%
Density: 1077 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Churchill
Lower Rent Nanango
Larger Population Nanango
More Affordable Nanango