Naremburn vs Acacia Gardens

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
5,924 #1,320
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$1,593/wk #76
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$602/wk #199
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
39 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$3,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$3,272/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$4,200/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Naremburn

18.4%
Affordable

Acacia Gardens

19.3%
Affordable

Naremburn

♂ 47.7% ♀ 52.3%
Density: 4741 people/km²

Acacia Gardens

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
Higher Income Naremburn
Lower Rent Acacia Gardens
Larger Population Naremburn
More Affordable Acacia Gardens

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level