National Park vs Raminea

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
80
👥 Population
40
$522/wk
💰 Median Weekly Income
$491/wk
$353/wk
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$275/wk
45 years
🎂 Median Age
51 years
$1,083/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$753/mo
$725/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$675/wk
$1,187/wk
👪 Family Income
$900/wk
2.0 people
🏡 Household Size
1.7 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

National Park

48.7%
Rent Stressed

Raminea

40.7%
Rent Stressed

National Park

♂ 55.8% ♀ 44.2%
Density: 2 people/km²

Raminea

♂ 52.4% ♀ 47.6%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income National Park
Lower Rent Raminea
Larger Population National Park
More Affordable Raminea

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level