Home → Suburbs → Compare
Oatlands vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
5,833 #1,346
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$848/wk #2,812
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$530/wk #461
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
42 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,817/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$2,292/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,556/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Oatlands
23.1%
Affordable
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Oatlands
♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 2369 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Acacia Gardens
Lower Rent Oatlands
Larger Population Oatlands
More Affordable Oatlands