O'Connor vs Hawker

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
5,917 #1,321
👥 Population
3,008 #2,408
$1,261/wk #326
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,169/wk #501
$451/wk #1,037
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$375/wk #2,632
35 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$2,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,000/mo
$2,518/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,251/wk
$3,463/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,826/wk
2.5 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

O'Connor

17.9%
Affordable

Hawker

16.7%
Affordable

O'Connor

♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 1437 people/km²

Hawker

♂ 49.2% ♀ 50.8%
Density: 1538 people/km²
Higher Income O'Connor
Lower Rent Hawker
Larger Population O'Connor
More Affordable Hawker

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level