Home → Suburbs → Compare
Osborne Park vs Piccadilly
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,463 #1,742
👥 Population
2,305 #2,822
$920/wk #1,905
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,314/wk #263
$290/wk #5,154
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$320/wk #4,051
34 years
🎂 Median Age
33 years
$1,546/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,517/mo
$1,478/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,212/wk
$1,960/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,761/wk
1.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Osborne Park
19.6%
Affordable
Piccadilly
14.5%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Osborne Park
♂ 49.4% ♀ 50.6%
Density: 900 people/km²
Piccadilly
♂ 51.3% ♀ 48.7%
Density: 1554 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Piccadilly
Lower Rent Osborne Park
Larger Population Osborne Park
More Affordable Osborne Park