Home → Suburbs → Compare
Parkinson vs Glass House Mountains
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
11,148 #520
👥 Population
5,601 #1,414
$845/wk #2,852
💰 Median Weekly Income
$739/wk #4,750
$450/wk #1,049
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$400/wk #1,854
37 years
🎂 Median Age
42 years
$1,950/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,820/mo
$2,188/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,740/wk
$2,258/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,861/wk
3.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.8 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Parkinson
20.6%
Affordable
Glass House Mountains
23.0%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Parkinson
♂ 48.8% ♀ 51.2%
Density: 1354 people/km²
Glass House Mountains
♂ 50.0% ♀ 50.0%
Density: 77 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Parkinson
Lower Rent Glass House Mountains
Larger Population Parkinson
More Affordable Glass House Mountains