Payneham vs Echunga

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,438 #2,753
👥 Population
1,219 #3,677
$874/wk #2,451
💰 Median Weekly Income
$887/wk #2,283
$300/wk #4,529
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$320/wk #4,051
38 years
🎂 Median Age
41 years
$1,700/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,761/mo
$1,414/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,090/wk
$2,092/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,322/wk
2.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Payneham

21.2%
Affordable

Echunga

15.3%
Affordable

Payneham

♂ 45.4% ♀ 54.6%
Density: 3067 people/km²

Echunga

♂ 50.1% ♀ 49.9%
Density: 43 people/km²
Higher Income Echunga
Lower Rent Payneham
Larger Population Payneham
More Affordable Payneham

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level