Home → Suburbs → Compare
Port Hacking vs Run-o-Waters
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
1,210 #3,687
👥 Population
605 #4,732
$1,231/wk #367
💰 Median Weekly Income
$881/wk #2,365
$795/wk #54
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$475/wk #822
40 years
🎂 Median Age
46 years
$3,500/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,167/mo
$3,394/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,229/wk
$3,553/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,358/wk
3.2 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Port Hacking
23.4%
Affordable
Run-o-Waters
21.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Port Hacking
♂ 49.3% ♀ 50.7%
Density: 2976 people/km²
Run-o-Waters
♂ 53.0% ♀ 47.0%
Density: 66 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Port Hacking
Lower Rent Run-o-Waters
Larger Population Port Hacking
More Affordable Run-o-Waters