Home → Suburbs → Compare
Port Noarlunga vs Hyde Park
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,245 #2,264
👥 Population
1,660 #3,272
$717/wk #5,153
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,133/wk #599
$320/wk #4,051
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$390/wk #2,258
46 years
🎂 Median Age
45 years
$1,534/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,300/mo
$1,369/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,208/wk
$1,831/wk
👪 Family Income
$3,010/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Port Noarlunga
23.4%
Affordable
Hyde Park
17.7%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Port Noarlunga
♂ 46.8% ♀ 53.2%
Density: 1297 people/km²
Hyde Park
♂ 47.4% ♀ 52.6%
Density: 2780 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Hyde Park
Lower Rent Port Noarlunga
Larger Population Port Noarlunga
More Affordable Port Noarlunga