Queens Park vs Katanning

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
7,268 #1,004
👥 Population
3,637 #2,075
$781/wk #3,921
💰 Median Weekly Income
$698/wk #5,526
$350/wk #3,104
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$200/wk #7,374
32 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$1,640/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,005/mo
$1,723/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,308/wk
$1,928/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,595/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Queens Park

20.3%
Affordable

Katanning

15.3%
Affordable

Queens Park

♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 2649 people/km²

Katanning

♂ 51.2% ♀ 48.8%
Density: 27 people/km²
Higher Income Queens Park
Lower Rent Katanning
Larger Population Queens Park
More Affordable Katanning

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level