Ramco vs Ceduna Waters

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
135 #8,056
👥 Population
186 #7,159
$765/wk #4,232
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,114/wk #654
$195/wk #7,729
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$320/wk #4,051
56 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$1,625/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,365/mo
$1,446/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,949/wk
$1,792/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,250/wk
2.1 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Ramco

13.5%
Affordable

Ceduna Waters

16.4%
Affordable

Ramco

♂ 50.4% ♀ 49.6%
Density: 34 people/km²

Ceduna Waters

♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 4 people/km²
Higher Income Ceduna Waters
Lower Rent Ramco
Larger Population Ceduna Waters
More Affordable Ramco

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level