Regency Downs vs Hyde Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,623 #2,636
👥 Population
1,374 #3,516
$660/wk #6,153
💰 Median Weekly Income
$848/wk #2,812
$368/wk #2,819
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$253/wk #6,093
37 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$1,517/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,444/mo
$1,570/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,338/wk
$1,711/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,031/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Regency Downs

23.4%
Affordable

Hyde Park

18.9%
Affordable

Regency Downs

♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 172 people/km²

Hyde Park

♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 1168 people/km²
Higher Income Hyde Park
Lower Rent Hyde Park
Larger Population Regency Downs
More Affordable Hyde Park

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level