Regency Downs vs Tanawha

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
2,623 #2,636
👥 Population
1,312 #3,581
$660/wk #6,153
💰 Median Weekly Income
$905/wk #2,070
$368/wk #2,819
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$408/wk #1,805
37 years
🎂 Median Age
40 years
$1,517/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,450/mo
$1,570/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,542/wk
$1,711/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,545/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Regency Downs

23.4%
Affordable

Tanawha

16.1%
Affordable

Regency Downs

♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 172 people/km²

Tanawha

♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 106 people/km²
Higher Income Tanawha
Lower Rent Regency Downs
Larger Population Regency Downs
More Affordable Regency Downs

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level