Home → Suburbs → Compare
Royal Park vs Payneham South
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,453 #2,157
👥 Population
1,731 #3,222
$751/wk #4,503
💰 Median Weekly Income
$789/wk #3,765
$330/wk #3,803
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$331/wk #3,795
37 years
🎂 Median Age
39 years
$1,560/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,789/mo
$1,414/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,560/wk
$1,832/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,143/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.4 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Royal Park
23.3%
Affordable
Payneham South
21.2%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Royal Park
♂ 48.0% ♀ 52.0%
Density: 2125 people/km²
Payneham South
♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 2997 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Payneham South
Lower Rent Royal Park
Larger Population Royal Park
More Affordable Royal Park