Home → Suburbs → Compare
Royal Park vs Tumby Bay
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
3,453 #2,157
👥 Population
1,781 #3,189
$751/wk #4,503
💰 Median Weekly Income
$624/wk #6,707
$330/wk #3,803
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$220/wk #7,029
37 years
🎂 Median Age
57 years
$1,560/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,200/mo
$1,414/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,058/wk
$1,832/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,463/wk
2.3 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Royal Park
23.3%
Affordable
Tumby Bay
20.8%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Royal Park
♂ 48.0% ♀ 52.0%
Density: 2125 people/km²
Tumby Bay
♂ 48.1% ♀ 51.9%
Density: 6 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Royal Park
Lower Rent Tumby Bay
Larger Population Royal Park
More Affordable Tumby Bay