Run-o-Waters vs Alstonvale

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
605 #4,732
👥 Population
431 #5,273
$881/wk #2,365
💰 Median Weekly Income
$844/wk #2,872
$475/wk #822
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$310/wk #4,328
46 years
🎂 Median Age
53 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,000/mo
$2,229/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,038/wk
$2,358/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,272/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.6 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Run-o-Waters

21.3%
Affordable

Alstonvale

15.2%
Affordable

Run-o-Waters

♂ 53.0% ♀ 47.0%
Density: 66 people/km²

Alstonvale

♂ 52.0% ♀ 48.0%
Density: 42 people/km²
Higher Income Run-o-Waters
Lower Rent Alstonvale
Larger Population Run-o-Waters
More Affordable Alstonvale

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level