Home → Suburbs → Compare
Run-o-Waters vs Stanwell Tops
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
605 #4,732
👥 Population
517 #4,973
$881/wk #2,365
💰 Median Weekly Income
$962/wk #1,506
$475/wk #822
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$650/wk #121
46 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$2,167/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,625/mo
$2,229/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,663/wk
$2,358/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,769/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
3.0 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Run-o-Waters
21.3%
Affordable
Stanwell Tops
24.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Run-o-Waters
♂ 53.0% ♀ 47.0%
Density: 66 people/km²
Stanwell Tops
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 110 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Stanwell Tops
Lower Rent Run-o-Waters
Larger Population Run-o-Waters
More Affordable Run-o-Waters