Running Stream vs Bakers Swamp

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
120 #8,425
👥 Population
60
$575/wk #7,429
💰 Median Weekly Income
$850/wk
$215/wk #7,179
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$180/wk
61 years
🎂 Median Age
49 years
$1,300/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,690/mo
$959/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,791/wk
$1,292/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,124/wk
1.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Running Stream

22.4%
Affordable

Bakers Swamp

10.1%
Affordable

Running Stream

♂ 52.1% ♀ 47.9%
Density: 0 people/km²

Bakers Swamp

♂ 49.2% ♀ 50.8%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income Bakers Swamp
Lower Rent Bakers Swamp
Larger Population Running Stream
More Affordable Bakers Swamp

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level