Samford Valley vs Wights Mountain

Population, income, rent and housing for Samford Valley, QLD and Wights Mountain, QLD, side by side.

Source: ABS Census of Population and Housing 2021, Suburb and Locality (SAL) level.

vs

Key figures

Samford Valley on the left, Wights Mountain on the right. Ranks are among all Australian suburbs, with 1 the highest.

3,208 Rank 2,287
Population
767 Rank 4,354
$1,029/wk Rank 1,039
Median Weekly Income
$1,092/wk Rank 743
$660/wk Rank 113
Median Weekly Rent
$350/wk Rank 3,104
45 years
Median Age
48 years
$2,600/mo
Monthly Mortgage
$2,507/mo
$3,250/wk
Household Income
$3,091/wk
$3,268/wk
Family Income
$3,106/wk
3.2 people
Household Size
2.8 people

Rent affordability

Median rent as a share of median household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25% to 35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stress.

Samford Valley

20.3%
Under 25%: affordable

Wights Mountain

11.3%
Under 25%: affordable

Demographics

Samford Valley

Male 50.2% Female 49.8%
Density: 158 people/km²

Wights Mountain

Male 49.3% Female 50.7%
Density: 89 people/km²

Side by side

Each pair of bars is scaled to the larger of the two values.

Summary

Higher median income Wights Mountain
Lower median rent Wights Mountain
Larger population Samford Valley
Lower rent share of income Wights Mountain

Suburb profiles

Data: ABS Census 2021, Suburb and Locality (SAL) level.