Home → Suburbs → Compare
Shanes Park vs Kameruka
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
384 #5,495
👥 Population
192 #7,064
$752/wk #4,475
💰 Median Weekly Income
$823/wk #3,204
$440/wk #1,252
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$260/wk #5,884
39 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$1,909/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,950/mo
$1,531/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,768/wk
$1,968/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,031/wk
2.9 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Shanes Park
28.7%
Moderate Stress
Kameruka
14.7%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Shanes Park
♂ 53.1% ♀ 46.9%
Density: 44 people/km²
Kameruka
♂ 50.8% ♀ 49.2%
Density: 6 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Kameruka
Lower Rent Kameruka
Larger Population Shanes Park
More Affordable Kameruka