Home → Suburbs → Compare
Springfield Lakes vs Woolloongabba
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
17,211 #208
👥 Population
8,687 #804
$994/wk #1,260
💰 Median Weekly Income
$866/wk #2,541
$410/wk #1,715
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$440/wk #1,252
31 years
🎂 Median Age
29 years
$1,800/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,000/mo
$2,184/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,863/wk
$2,295/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,371/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.1 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Springfield Lakes
18.8%
Affordable
Woolloongabba
23.6%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Springfield Lakes
♂ 48.7% ♀ 51.3%
Density: 1937 people/km²
Woolloongabba
♂ 50.4% ♀ 49.6%
Density: 3479 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Springfield Lakes
Lower Rent Springfield Lakes
Larger Population Springfield Lakes
More Affordable Springfield Lakes