Home → Suburbs → Compare
Sydney Olympic Park vs Acacia Gardens
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,848 #1,620
👥 Population
3,668 #2,065
$1,135/wk #592
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,055/wk #896
$520/wk #502
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$540/wk #435
31 years
🎂 Median Age
36 years
$2,400/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$2,484/mo
$1,975/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,796/wk
$2,258/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,800/wk
2.0 people
🏡 Household Size
3.2 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Sydney Olympic Park
26.3%
Moderate Stress
Acacia Gardens
19.3%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Sydney Olympic Park
♂ 50.4% ♀ 49.6%
Density: 730 people/km²
Acacia Gardens
♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3663 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Sydney Olympic Park
Lower Rent Sydney Olympic Park
Larger Population Sydney Olympic Park
More Affordable Sydney Olympic Park