Home → Suburbs → Compare
Tannum Sands vs Regency Downs
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
5,227 #1,505
👥 Population
2,623 #2,636
$877/wk #2,406
💰 Median Weekly Income
$660/wk #6,153
$290/wk #5,154
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$368/wk #2,819
41 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$1,733/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,517/mo
$2,035/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,570/wk
$2,409/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,711/wk
2.6 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Tannum Sands
14.3%
Affordable
Regency Downs
23.4%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Tannum Sands
♂ 49.6% ♀ 50.4%
Density: 68 people/km²
Regency Downs
♂ 50.6% ♀ 49.4%
Density: 172 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Tannum Sands
Lower Rent Tannum Sands
Larger Population Tannum Sands
More Affordable Tannum Sands