Tara vs Litchfield Park

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
62
👥 Population
34
$369/wk
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,125/wk
$70/wk
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$70/wk
21 years
🎂 Median Age
38 years
$0/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,500/mo
$900/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,875/wk
$871/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,333/wk
4.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Tara

7.8%
Affordable

Litchfield Park

3.7%
Affordable

Tara

♂ 45.2% ♀ 54.8%
Density: 9 people/km²

Litchfield Park

♂ 58.8% ♀ 41.2%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income Litchfield Park
Lower Rent Tara
Larger Population Tara
More Affordable Tara

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level