Home → Suburbs → Compare
Taromeo vs Banks Pocket
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
373 #5,552
👥 Population
187 #7,148
$454/wk #8,615
💰 Median Weekly Income
$850/wk #2,768
$260/wk #5,884
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$390/wk #2,258
56 years
🎂 Median Age
46 years
$1,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,733/mo
$911/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,143/wk
$1,087/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,178/wk
2.2 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Taromeo
28.5%
Moderate Stress
Banks Pocket
18.2%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Taromeo
♂ 51.9% ♀ 48.1%
Density: 4 people/km²
Banks Pocket
♂ 53.8% ♀ 46.2%
Density: 214 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Banks Pocket
Lower Rent Taromeo
Larger Population Taromeo
More Affordable Taromeo