Home → Suburbs → Compare
Tatura vs New Gisborne
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
4,955 #1,582
👥 Population
2,509 #2,715
$715/wk #5,198
💰 Median Weekly Income
$874/wk #2,451
$245/wk #6,551
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$451/wk #1,037
44 years
🎂 Median Age
41 years
$1,300/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,950/mo
$1,357/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$2,279/wk
$1,801/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,584/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
2.9 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
New Gisborne
19.8%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Tatura
♂ 49.6% ♀ 50.4%
Density: 40 people/km²
New Gisborne
♂ 48.6% ♀ 51.4%
Density: 96 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income New Gisborne
Lower Rent Tatura
Larger Population Tatura
More Affordable Tatura