Tinderbox vs Reedy Marsh

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
392 #5,457
👥 Population
199 #6,970
$929/wk #1,820
💰 Median Weekly Income
$450/wk #8,639
$500/wk #576
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$300/wk #4,529
52 years
🎂 Median Age
53 years
$1,821/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,149/mo
$2,303/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,024/wk
$2,654/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,406/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
2.5 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Tinderbox

21.7%
Affordable

Reedy Marsh

29.3%
Moderate Stress

Tinderbox

♂ 48.3% ♀ 51.7%
Density: 37 people/km²

Reedy Marsh

♂ 56.4% ♀ 43.6%
Density: 2 people/km²
Higher Income Tinderbox
Lower Rent Reedy Marsh
Larger Population Tinderbox
More Affordable Reedy Marsh

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level