Tumbling Waters vs Ghan

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
254 #6,383
👥 Population
132 #8,121
$858/wk #2,652
💰 Median Weekly Income
$1,100/wk #705
$350/wk #3,104
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$0/wk #8,863
37 years
🎂 Median Age
32 years
$2,000/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$1,800/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$2,333/wk
$2,023/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,437/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
3.1 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Tumbling Waters

19.4%
Affordable

Ghan

Tumbling Waters

♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 4 people/km²

Ghan

♂ 51.9% ♀ 48.1%
Density: 0 people/km²
Higher Income Ghan
Lower Rent Tumbling Waters
Larger Population Tumbling Waters
More Affordable Tumbling Waters

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level