Undera vs Swanpool

Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data

Tap to change
VS
Tap to change
450 #5,198
👥 Population
227 #6,644
$683/wk #5,780
💰 Median Weekly Income
$539/wk #7,844
$235/wk #6,749
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$220/wk #7,029
42 years
🎂 Median Age
54 years
$1,180/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,192/mo
$1,458/wk
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Household Income
$1,104/wk
$1,735/wk
👪 Family Income
$1,333/wk
2.7 people
🏡 Household Size
2.2 people

Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.

Undera

16.1%
Affordable

Swanpool

19.9%
Affordable

Undera

♂ 50.9% ♀ 49.1%
Density: 3 people/km²

Swanpool

♂ 49.8% ♀ 50.2%
Density: 3 people/km²
Higher Income Undera
Lower Rent Swanpool
Larger Population Undera
More Affordable Undera

Data: ABS Census 2021 — Suburb and Locality (SAL) level