Home → Suburbs → Compare
Wandering vs Hamersley Range
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
391 #5,463
👥 Population
197 #6,995
$768/wk #4,169
💰 Median Weekly Income
$2,167/wk #12
$200/wk #7,374
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$0/wk #8,863
50 years
🎂 Median Age
37 years
$1,600/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$0/mo
$1,571/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$0/wk
$1,924/wk
👪 Family Income
$0/wk
2.4 people
🏡 Household Size
2.0 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
Wandering
12.7%
Affordable
👥 Demographics
Wandering
♂ 54.0% ♀ 46.0%
Density: 1 people/km²
Hamersley Range
♂ 71.8% ♀ 28.2%
Density: 0 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Hamersley Range
Lower Rent Wandering
Larger Population Wandering
More Affordable Wandering