Home → Suburbs → Compare
Warner vs Clinton
Side-by-side comparison using ABS Census 2021 data
Tap to change
VS Tap to change
12,264 #437
👥 Population
6,170 #1,274
$1,025/wk #1,066
💰 Median Weekly Income
$775/wk #4,045
$420/wk #1,513
🏠 Median Weekly Rent
$270/wk #5,664
33 years
🎂 Median Age
34 years
$1,980/mo
🏦 Monthly Mortgage
$1,517/mo
$2,296/wk
👨👩👧👦 Household Income
$1,701/wk
$2,429/wk
👪 Family Income
$2,013/wk
3.0 people
🏡 Household Size
2.7 people
🏠 Rent Affordability
Rent as a percentage of household income. Under 25% is affordable, 25-35% is moderate stress, over 35% is rent stressed.
👥 Demographics
Warner
♂ 49.0% ♀ 51.0%
Density: 1158 people/km²
Clinton
♂ 49.9% ♀ 50.1%
Density: 990 people/km²
🏆 Summary
Higher Income Warner
Lower Rent Clinton
Larger Population Warner
More Affordable Clinton